Comments: friends rejoined

I just wanna know what are you haveing for your breakfast everyday , because I have tried everything , but You are still Hours ahead of everyone else

Posted by ardeshir at July 25, 2003 01:48 AM

Unexpected this is. No more training do you require Jedi-rouh. Already know you that which you need.
Remember, a Jedi's strength flows from the Force. But beware, soft focus, wedding photography and taking pictures drunken friends. The dark side are they. Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny. Sam...Do not...Do not underestimate the powers of the dark side, or suffer you will.

May the force be with you

Posted by Yoda & Shirin at July 25, 2003 05:34 AM

Finally! A picture I don't like very much! I've been waiting for you to post something that sucked just a little, and you've finally come through for me. Thank you Sam.

Sky is nice, but the colour of the roof and gulls is a little drab, and the middle gull looks awkward. You should have hired the gulls from your other shot. Those guys knew how to pose.

Posted by scott at July 25, 2003 10:17 AM

Scott, firstly, you clearly have no taste so I’m actually quite glad that you don’t like this picture. Secondly, for your information, my mate Fred is not looking at all awkward; he is merely inspecting that piece of freshly laid turd to his right and at the same time checking out Pat’s lovely buttocks. Crafty, wouldn’t you say?
Best be off now, nice bit of fish over there, lovely.

Posted by George the seagull at July 25, 2003 02:32 PM

Nice shot. I don't like it as much as your other
ones.You see the sky is really nice. And the composition is also good.But the birds are a bit dark.They seem so cruel,and proud after a general
massacre.Or maybe that's just my imagination. See ,there's nothing wrong with the photo it's just that it's not my type.

Posted by Telli at July 25, 2003 04:01 PM

Your ambiguous title "friends rejoined" reminds me of ourselves (M., you & me). I have not seen "Finding Nemo" and do not know what's the relation with that, though.

I enjoy your shots...

Posted by hadi at July 25, 2003 04:05 PM

CoOoL!

Posted by ila at July 25, 2003 06:07 PM

Morning threesome. I wonder which one is the girl.

Posted by Boreo at July 25, 2003 11:57 PM

Course both of those birdies on the front also happen to be lovely ladies. One is Pat with the lovely buttocks (cor blinme gav) and the other is Sonia (which I wasn’t so keen on but Pat said she’d bring a friend and then it was kinda rude to say no I don’t want to have a threesome with her) Boreo man, there’s no way I’d ever wanna have a threesome with a girl and another guy. That’s just not my style. Know what I’m saying? I mean doing that would be alright if one were into that sort of stuff and like maybe enjoyed a little cheeky finger up the bum when doing the deed. Perhaps maybe if one were the type who licks the stamp on both sides or was thinking about permanently batting for the pink team or had one foot in the closet or… the list goes. Get my drift?

Posted by Fred the Seagull at July 26, 2003 06:58 AM

Didn't I said that the title is ambiguous! LOL

Posted by hadi at July 27, 2003 11:14 AM

Vulnerability of one reveals the predictability of the other. Sexual connotation has masked the true meaning of too many words -- only understood by the one.

Posted by Boreo at July 27, 2003 10:44 PM

Ey?

Posted by Fred the seagull at July 28, 2003 09:30 AM