Comments: wrapped statue

why base your decision to see the movie on what other people think? why not go and make your own assessment of the movie? i read the book and ill certainly watch the movie to see how it compares. oh yeah, and yesterday's image was stunning, and another reason why this site still remains my favorite photoblog on the net.

Posted by Jesse at May 20, 2006 05:03 AM

A plastic wrapped Madonna and child. It goes with plastic Jesus statues no doubt. Someone finally trying to hide the graven images Catholics fill their temples with?

I prefer the Jewish and Moslem temples which avoid any notion of anyone knowing what these people looked like and obey the ban on graven images as given in Genesis.

Posted by Hugh Petrie at May 20, 2006 08:35 AM

Nice photo...and The DaVinci Code was very good, it followed the book, so if you liked the book you'll probably like the movie.

Posted by Nick Dean at May 20, 2006 08:35 AM

Nice shot, they look very sad, as they have to move to the basement cause some more popular icon get there place.

Posted by Marinus at May 20, 2006 08:37 AM

... Christo? (!)

:)

Posted by lisa at May 20, 2006 09:16 AM

Thanks Sam

Posted by Anne at May 20, 2006 09:27 AM

don't listen to the critics!
what do theyyy know. you gotta find out for yourself sam!

Posted by andy boudreau at May 20, 2006 09:39 AM

Very interesting!Like artwork of Cristo!?
The Da Vinci Code is hidden in the wall pattern!

Posted by Harlequinpan at May 20, 2006 11:58 AM

I didn't read the book and I'm a completly non-religious person, and I loved the movie. Its great entertainment.

Posted by Bu11et at May 20, 2006 12:05 PM

Oh, this is disturbing, and I'm not even Catholic.

Posted by micki at May 20, 2006 12:21 PM

i think the movie has been underrated because people read the book. when you read a book and then see the movie made from it, its always kind of decieving.

Posted by Mim at May 20, 2006 01:51 PM

movie was pretty good, the acting was maybe subpar, maybe that's why it got a bad review. however for me, it was all about the story! what an entrawling plot. tasty treat.

Posted by stephenHUBBARD at May 20, 2006 03:03 PM

Yeah, I saw the movie last night having not read the book and I'd say its as good as todays picture.

Posted by darren at May 20, 2006 03:10 PM

The movie is underrated compared to the book? I thought the book was a formulaic piece of trash, so I can only imagine how bad the movie is.

Posted by Soloman at May 20, 2006 03:51 PM

Yes Mim I agree, and Sam I have noticed that the friends I have that DID read the book first are giving the lesser of the reviews, and the ones who have NOT are giving great reviews. I will find out how it is for myself tonight. ....P.S. I love how you view the world.

Posted by CHRISSY at May 20, 2006 05:11 PM

I just got back from the movie. It was GREAT. But i guessed the ending.

Godspeed.

Posted by tee at May 20, 2006 11:03 PM

The importance of the Da Vinci Code lies far beyond it's cinematic presentation, and rather poignantly symbolic, like your image, it allows us to see the veil of untruths and unify our ideas of divinity.

Posted by maria at May 21, 2006 01:01 AM

I think you should definately see the movie despite what the critics are saying. I saw it on Saturday and I must say, it was actually a very good movie.

Posted by Raffi at May 21, 2006 11:30 AM

Good shot, perhaps you should forget the Davinci code all together and post it for the season 2 finale of Lost!

Posted by phirleh at May 21, 2006 11:51 AM

believe it or not, i've yet to read the book. it's nice for you to jump out of your element with pictures like these.

Posted by shane j montgomery at May 21, 2006 01:04 PM

Hate it ;(

Posted by Olive at May 21, 2006 03:38 PM

If you read the book, well then you don't really need to waste money on seeing the movie (wait for rental). But, if you haven't read the book, I recommend seeing the movie and taking your own interpretation of it (critics are mostly biased anyway).
It's very much a historical story rather than religious dogma and I think that's the misconception most people have.
There were religious protesters outside the theatre when I went to see, yet I wasn't sure why exactly they were protesting the film. Their signs were filled with phrases saying "Blasphemy provokes God's wrath" and countless messages preaching that the film is "vulgar fiction." Well... yes... it IS fiction. And what exactly in the film is blasphemous that IS NOT in any other film? Right... people are just ignorant, most of the time.

Posted by Elissa at May 22, 2006 07:32 PM

a comment perhaps on how the west keeps it's religion very much under wraps? or am i reading too much into this?

Posted by david at May 23, 2006 03:30 AM

If you enjoyed the book, you'll enjoy the movie. I'm not sure what all those critics are harping on about. Tom Hanks and Audrey Tatou were neither of my first choices for those lead roles, but they did a good job.

Anyway, great capture, as always!

Posted by Susheela at May 23, 2006 05:01 PM

this is a wonderfully symbolic shot. I love it.

Posted by susan at May 24, 2006 09:18 AM

You have a cool site keep up the good work

Posted by jessie at May 26, 2006 07:04 AM
Post a comment










Remember personal info?


Note: your comments might not appear instantly due to comment moderation to prevent spamming.