Holy crap. I freaked out for a minute there.
Posted by Gloria at June 10, 2005 02:34 AMno wonder there isn't even one police officer ...
Posted by Jeff at June 10, 2005 02:58 AMOops... what's happen?
Posted by Cirox at June 10, 2005 03:01 AMoh MAN that would have been fun to do.
Posted by Jon Clark at June 10, 2005 04:33 AMI noticed it's in a predominatly english speaking country. Scary.
Posted by bjam at June 10, 2005 06:32 AMVery disturbing :<
Posted by Sara D'amore at June 10, 2005 06:57 AMwoah, that was a scare, good thing u put the art installation part:S
Posted by Andy at June 10, 2005 08:14 AMHow come I never see anything interesting like that in downtown Atlanta? Oi.
Posted by Eric at June 10, 2005 08:14 AMharsh
Posted by blu at June 10, 2005 08:35 AMLove the website- you've been my homepage for as long as I can remember. This photo is great because of my disdain of the 'new crowning jewel' of public spaces in Toronto. If they did have a car bomb go off there, noone would even notice!
Posted by Jason Jackson at June 10, 2005 08:52 AMHi! Just found you via the Star article. Startling contrast, car bomb and dude with water bottle; car bomb and people sitting around in the plaza chatting away. Great "essence of Toronto" shot! I would like to start photographing people but am too shy to intrude. Glad to have found your site, will check back often. Well done!
Posted by zenitlady at June 10, 2005 08:53 AMGood subject, but I can't help thinking the colours are a bit *too* oversaturated on this one. Normally I really go for the strong colour / contrast of your stuff, but this one doesn't quite work for me I'm afraid.
Posted by Andrew at June 10, 2005 08:54 AMIts interesting to see this statement. Thanks for the capture!
Mark-
Oh my, quite a powerful image.
Posted by Teja at June 10, 2005 09:14 AMIsuzu Rodeo?
Posted by Hanoj at June 10, 2005 09:19 AMHoly crap! It's frightening how destructive we walking apes can be.
Posted by Darren at June 10, 2005 09:46 AMseems like toronto is a very art friendly city. i like this picture.
Posted by jesse at June 10, 2005 09:48 AMI've always really enjoyed my daily visits to DDOI, but I'm wondering if you've been feeling ill lately or have other big things on your mind for the past week or so. It seems to me that you've lost your inspiration for greater creativity lately. I understand though that it must be difficult to capture interesting and inspired photos on a daily basis, especially while working a day job.
As for this shot...I feel the whole upper half is rather pointless and distracting. Surely you could have found a much more interesting angle to shoot this somewhat interesting subject from....I know YOU can.
I don't mean to sound judgemental but I guess I'm just wooried about ya!
Cheers
Ron
wow, wasnt expecting this before i started to scroll down. very interesting.
Posted by kc at June 10, 2005 12:08 PMfreaked me out when I saw the picture. I thought, what an amazing photo oportunity...then I read the caption ;-)
Personally, while a cool pic, I don't know that you need all the "extra" stuff above the car showing as much sky and buildings. I would have cropped it a bit instead. Just my opinion of course.
Great Picture!
Posted by Carl B. Constantine at June 10, 2005 12:28 PMWhy do I never find these photo opps in Montreal?
Since it's my first comment, I'll say that I can't get enough of this photoblog. Great pix. Keep up the good work.
Posted by JELIEL³ at June 10, 2005 12:35 PMi'm not sure if you are aware yet, but on the widget for tiger, it only showed the top half of the photo. i wasn't sure if this was intentional or not.
Posted by rich at June 10, 2005 12:39 PMtoronto sounds like a very interesting city.
i really have to visit this place.
I found the top of the pic just as artistic as the bottom. Keep up the good work Sam. We in the tiny towns with no skyscrapers love your work.
Hotshots Camera Club.
i totally agree with ron. lately, nothing outstanding.
Posted by tom at June 10, 2005 01:45 PMGreat shot, Sam. I love the contrast of rich colors throughout this.
Posted by abe at June 10, 2005 02:11 PM1. The "extra stuff" at the top of the picture is a necessary contrast to the image of the car. I, like many scrolled down and the whole mood of the photo changed. Good color contrast between light and dark fits the subject matter well.
2. This "art" project would be surrounded by protesters if it was in the US. It doesn't seem like something a lot of people over here would want thrown in their faces.
3. My feeling on the "art" is that it's exploitative to people in several regions of the earth who have to live with this real fear on a daily basis. Kind of like the news exploiting personal tragedies to make money off commercials.
First, as someone from Toronto but who now lives elsewhere, I love the top, because it helps me see more of the city. From an artistic perspective I also think it creates a great contrast with the car.
To J, above, you're right it would be surrounded by protesters in the US, but the US doesn't want to see anything that reminds them of what is really going on in Iraq right now, and I can't really say I blame them for that. That doesn't mean it's a bad piece of art though.
Really, I don't think this piece is offensive in anyway. It's not meant to say 'hey, look how cool a blown up car is', it's meant to say 'look at the destruction these things can cause', and to get you thinking about why people would do such a thing.
In summary, great pic, great art.
Posted by Dan at June 10, 2005 04:33 PMlike most of your recent pictures, WAY too much saturation.
Posted by JWL at June 10, 2005 05:01 PMThe top half of the photo immediately sets the scene for any Torontonian. You see those buildings/billboards and you know where you are. And then to see a bombed out car, perhaps immediately after reading the latest news -- my reaction was very visceral. That changed to relief that in Canada we are not threatened with the reality this "art installation" presents. Far too many people in this world are...
Posted by peter at June 10, 2005 05:58 PMIt will be a sad day when this happens for real in Toronto or any American (Canadian too) city.
I disagree with those who think the top of the image is irrelevant. It very much sets the picture and the bizarreness that such a scene could happen and there as much as anywhere - with the people in the background dying or injured and more mess.
:D (ما اگر اینجا فارسی بنویسیم مشکلی داره؟)
Posted by amin at June 10, 2005 10:24 PMI don't know what to say. But it's really terrible.
Posted by Mmbear_Ed at June 10, 2005 11:06 PMJust so happens that Matt from the narrative has MORE vehicular distruction at http://www.thenarrative.net/archive/000840.php (the real thing, though).
Posted by David S at June 10, 2005 11:06 PMWow, totally scared me there. Interesting. . .
Posted by Mark at June 11, 2005 02:42 AMI love the heighth of the photo.. that you have to scroll down through normalcy to get to the stark contrast of the car. Fantastic.
Posted by Sean Galbraith at June 11, 2005 05:12 PMIt is really interesting to read different people's take on this 'installation'. It was intended as a reaction to SUVs and our reliance on oil. It has nothing to do with Iraq, or car bombings in general. From the website Sam has linked to: "ATTACK: an explosive, graphically violent work serving as an indictment of the oil and auto industries, government and rampant consumerism; it will enlighten public awareness of the perverse effects of our overdependence on the "black gold". (You can see 3 other pictures of it on my photo-blog, too.)
Posted by David S at June 13, 2005 01:58 PM